Skip to Content

The Cochrane Library

Trusted evidence. Informed decisions. Better health.

Open menu

Scolaris Language Selector Scolaris Language Selector

Scolaris Content Language Banner Portlet Scolaris Content Language Banner Portlet

Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Special Collections

Chronic suppurative otitis media: effectiveness of non-surgical treatments

16 April 2021
Collapse all Expand all
Special Collection

First published on 4 March 2021, updated on 16 April 2021 (changes detailed below) 

Chronic suppurative otitis media (CSOM) is a chronic inflammation of the middle ear and mastoid cavity, often involving infection from more than one micro-organism. Its predominant symptoms are ear discharge and hearing loss.

CSOM is estimated to have a global incidence of 31 million episodes per year, with 22% of cases affecting children under five years of age.[1,2] Its prevalence varies widely between countries, but disproportionately affects people at socio-economic disadvantage. It is rare in high-income countries but common in many low- and middle-income countries.[1,2,3,4]

Most patients with CSOM experience temporary or permanent hearing loss,[5] which can be disabling and can have an impact on speech and language skills, employment prospects, and on children's psychosocial and cognitive development, including academic performance.[4,6,7] CSOM can also progress to serious complications in rare cases, with both extracranial complications (such as mastoid abscess, postauricular fistula, or facial palsy) and intracranial complications (such as otitic meningitis, lateral sinus thrombosis, or cerebellar abscess) having been reported.[8,9]
Many people who are affected by CSOM do not have good access to modern primary healthcare, let alone specialised ear, nose and throat (ENT) care. To support the development and updating of guidelines affecting these settings, Cochrane ENT prioritized the evidence needed, and produced the reviews collated in this Cochrane Library Special Collection, which brings together up-to-date evidence on non-surgical treatments for CSOM.

The Evidently Cochrane blog can be accessed here.

Updated 16 April 2021: added Cochrane Clinical Answer to the reviews 'Topical antiseptics for chronic suppurative otitis media'; 'Antibiotics versus topical antiseptics for chronic suppurative otitis media' and 'Aural toilet for chronic suppurative otitis media' 

Topical antibiotics for chronic suppurative otitis media

Topical antibiotics, the most common treatment for CSOM, act to kill or inhibit the growth of micro‐organisms that may be responsible for the infection. They can be used alone or in addition to other treatments for CSOM, such as antiseptics or ear cleaning (aural toileting). They can be applied directly to the ear as drops, ointments, sprays, or creams, potentially delivering high concentrations of antibiotic to the affected area. This review assesses the effects of topical antibiotics (without steroids) for people with CSOM. Associated Cochrane Clinical Answer: What are the benefits and harms of topical antibiotics for people with chronic suppurative otitis media?

Topical antibiotics with steroids for chronic suppurative otitis media

Topical steroids are added to some topical antibiotic preparations, usually in the form of ear drops. It is thought that the addition of topical steroids to topical antibiotics could reduce the degree of inflammation in the outer or middle ear, which might also improve penetration of the antibiotic agent and reduce allergic sensitivity to the antibiotic component of ear drops. Although topical antibiotics are widely recommended as the first-line treatment for CSOM there are variations in practice and opinions as to whether preparations with additional topical steroids should be used. This review assesses the effects of topical antibiotics with steroids for people with CSOM. Associated Cochrane Clinical Answer: For people with chronic suppurative otitis media treated topically, how does an antibiotic (quinolone or non‐quinolone) plus steroid compare with a quinolone alone?

Topical antiseptics for chronic suppurative otitis media

 Topical antiseptics are substances that kill or inhibit the growth and development of micro-organisms. Agents that have been used for treating CSOM include povidone-iodine, aluminium acetate, boric acid, chlorhexidine, alcohol, acetic acid, and hydrogen peroxide. Antiseptics or their application can cause irritation of the skin of the outer ear, manifesting as discomfort, pain, or itching. Some antiseptics may have the potential to be toxic to the inner ear, with a possible increased risk of causing sensorineural hearing loss, dizziness, or tinnitus. This review assesses the effects of topical antiseptics for people with CSOM. Associated Cochrane Clinical AnswerWhat are the benefits and harms of topical antiseptics for people with chronic suppurative otitis media? 

Antibiotics versus topical antiseptics for chronic suppurative otitis media

Antibiotics and antiseptics kill or inhibit the micro‐organisms that may be responsible for CSOM infection. Antibiotics can be applied topically or administered systemically via the oral or injection route. Antiseptics are always directly applied to the ear (topically). This review compares the effects of antibiotics versus topical antiseptics for people with CSOM. Associated Cochrane Clinical AnswerHow do topical or combined topical/systemic antibiotics compare with topical antiseptics for people with chronic suppurative otitis media?

Systemic antibiotics for chronic suppurative otitis media

Antibiotics may be administered systemically, either by mouth, by injection into a vein (intravenous) or by injection into muscles (intramuscular). Although topical antibiotics are widely recommended as the first-line treatment for CSOM, systemic antibiotics are still used in situations where the delivery of drops to the middle ear is difficult. These include the treatment of young children and people with small perforations and/or copious ear discharge. Some antibiotics may be unsuitable for formulation as a topical ear drop so systemic antibiotics remain a viable option for the delivery of broad-spectrum antibiotics. Systemic antibiotics can have off-target side effects, such as diarrhoea or nausea, and also carry a risk of systemic allergic reactions such as a skin rash. This review assesses the effects of systemic antibiotics for people with CSOM. Associated Cochrane Clinical Answer: For people with chronic suppurative otitis media, what are the effects of systemic antibiotics?

Topical versus systemic antibiotics for chronic suppurative otitis media

The predominant symptoms of CSOM are ear discharge and hearing loss. Antibiotics are the most common treatment for CSOM, which act to kill or inhibit the growth of micro‐organisms that may be responsible for the infection. Antibiotics can be administered both topically and systemically, and can be used alone or in addition to other treatments for CSOM such as ear cleaning (aural toileting). This review compares the effects of antibiotics delivered topically (drops, ointments, sprays or creams) versus systemically (by mouth, intravenous or intramuscular) for people with CSOM. Associated Cochrane Clinical AnswerFor people with chronic suppurative otitis media, how does a topical quinolone compare with a systemic antibiotic?

Aural toilet (ear cleaning) for chronic suppurative otitis media

Aural toilet is an umbrella term describing a number of processes for manually cleaning the ear. Techniques used may include dry mopping (with cotton wool or tissue paper), suction clearance (typically under a microscope), or irrigation (using manual or automated syringing). Dry mopping may be effective in removing mucopurulent discharge. Compared to irrigation or microsuction it is less effective in removing epithelial debris or thick pus. Aural toileting can be used alone or in addition to other treatments for CSOM, such as antibiotics or topical antiseptics, to manually clean the ear canal, however, there have been reports of pain, bleeding and dizziness and/or vertigo with aural toileting. This review assesses the effects of aural toilet procedures for people with CSOM. Associated Cochrane Clinical AnswerFor children with chronic suppurative otitis media, what are the effects of aural toileting?

About this Special Collection

References

1. Monasta L, Ronfani L, Marchetti F, Montico M, Vecchi Brumatti L, Bavcar A, et al. Burden of disease caused by otitis media: systematic review and global estimates. PLOS One 2012;7(4):e36226. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0036226

2. Schilder AG, Chonmaitree T, Cripps AW, Rosenfeld RM, Casselbrant ML, Haggard MP, et al. Otitis media. Nature Reviews Disease Primers 2016;2:16063. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrdp.2016.63

3. Mahadevan M, Navarro-Locsin G, Tan HK, Yamanaka N, Sonsuwan N, Wang PC, et al. A review of the burden of disease due to otitis media in the Asia-Pacific. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology 2012;76(5):623-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2012.02.031

4. World Health Organization. Chronic Suppurative Otitis Media (CSOM): Burden of Illness and Management Options. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, 2004. apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/42941

5. Jensen RG, Koch A, Homøe P. The risk of hearing loss in a population with a high prevalence of chronic suppurative otitis media. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology 2013;77(9):1530-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2013.06.025

6. Elemraid MA, Brabin BJ, Fraser WD, Harper G, Faragher B, Atef Z, et al. Characteristics of hearing impairment in Yemeni children with chronic suppurative otitis media: a case-control study. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology 2010;74(3):283-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2009.12.004

7. Olatoke F, Ologe FE, Nwawolo CC, Saka MJ. The prevalence of hearing loss among schoolchildren with chronic suppurative otitis media in Nigeria, and its effect on academic performance. Ear, Nose & Throat Journal 2008;87(12):E19. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19105130

8. Dubey SP, Larawin V. Complications of chronic suppurative otitis media and their management. Laryngoscope 2007;117(2):264-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlg.0000249728.48588.22

9. Yorgancılar E, Yildirim M, Gun R, Bakir S, Tekin R, Gocmez C, et al. Complications of chronic suppurative otitis media: a retrospective review. European Archives of Oto-rhino-laryngology 2013;270(1):69-76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-012-1924-8

Acknowledgements

This project was funded by the NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Ear and Hearing Health of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Children (NHMRC CRE_ICHEAR). The contents of the publications arising from this work are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not reflect the views of NHMRC.

This project was supported by the National Institute for Health Research, via Cochrane Infrastructure, Cochrane Programme Grant, or Cochrane Incentive funding to Cochrane ENT. The views and opinions expressed therein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Systematic Reviews Programme, NIHR, NHS or the Department of Health.

Image credit

Fertnig/GettyImages

Contact

Cochrane Editorial and Methods Department ([email protected])

Close
Review tools & navigation